Good Sense

Melissa Dereberry's Blog

Archive for the category “Current Events”

No Bats Allowed

In December, a South Carolina woman died of rabies contracted from a bat, the first case in that state in 50 years.  Five days ago, Reuters reported that a Massachusetts man died from the first case of human rabies in that state since 1935.  Doctors say he was likely infected by a bat—the man was not even aware of having been bitten.  Two days ago, officials in Rhode Island say a group of people may have been exposed to rabies by a bat a man was carrying in a cage.  Peter Hanney, spokesperson for the RI Health Department said that even though the bat got away, anyone who came near the bat should be evaluated and/or treated for rabies, because rabies “is highly transmissible to humans, even without a bite or scratch from the animal,” according to Hanney .  (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/02/us-bat-rhodeisland-idUSTRE81123F20120202).

Fox news recently interviewed Dr. Steven Garner, New York Methodist Hospital Radiology Chair, on the Massachusetts  case, citing several animals that are known to carry rabies, including bats, raccoons, foxes, coyotes, and, surprisingly, domestic cats.  The disease, he points out, is 100% preventable with vaccinations.  Bats, because they are so small and have tiny razor sharp teeth, can actually be inside your home and bite you unawares.  Garner says if a bat is found in your home, unless you can trap the bat and have it tested, you must be vaccinated because “you just don’t know.”  The CDC reports that the most common cause of rabies in humans is from infected bats.  (http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/bats/education/index.html).  While unlikely, exposure to rabies can, and does, happen.  Not only that, but we should be diligent when we come into any sort of contact with them, especially in our homes.

Bats used to have sort of a bad rap, stemming, I guess, from vampire stories and old wives tales.  Then, sometime in the eighties or nineties, bat awareness, education and conservation came on the scene and suddenly, bats were everybody’s best friend.  People were buying bat houses and trying to protect the habitats and reputations of the sorely “misunderstood” critters.

I’m all for conservation.  I love animals.  I believe in humane, respectful treatment of nature.  But I think the bat movement pulled a fast one.  People have always known, I guess, that bats carry rabies, but somehow, I missed the day my school teachers talked about rabies because they were likely too busy talking about how cool bats were.  In college, some friends and I went walking through the infamous “Bat Cave” on some old property just outside of Lebanon, MO.  It didn’t even dawn on us that we were surrounded by—you guessed it—bats.  We had nothing to fear.  Bats were our friends.

I can tell you a short personal bat story that has changed, forever how I feel about them.  For me, this is the real truth about bats:  They are not my friends.  About four years ago, I found my two kids playing with a comatose bat in our yard.  I picked the thing up to get it away from them.   After sending it off for testing through a local veterinarian’s office, we learned it was, in fact, rabid, and that they would have to undergo a series of rabies shots immediately*.  Not only would that, but I, too, have to get the shots because of possible exposure.  In short, we got the shots and recovered with no long-term effects beyond the emotional trauma of the whole experience.  For the skeptics:  Imagine, learning you’ve been exposed to a deadly virus in your own back yard, getting a personal phone call from the Health Department.  A year or two later, on a field trip with my son’s class, while on a nature hike, I noticed some kids huddling around something, talking excitedly amongst themselves.  When I approached, I discovered it was a bat lying on the ground.  Instantly, I went into hyper-bat-alarm mode and bellowed, “Get away from the bat!”  Ironically, on another field trip just a week later, we were at a conservation department watching an educational video about how interesting, cool and misunderstood bats are.  I wanted to raise my hand and say, “Bats may be cool, but they are one of the top carriers of the deadly rabies virus in the U.S.  Don’t get too close to them.”

Somehow, I’d gotten through 40 years of life without learning about the dangers of bats.  Is the bat conservation movement to blame?  Maybe.  Sometimes, the best lessons come through experience.  And though this one isn’t one I’d care to repeat, I now know it’s prudent to keep a safe distance from these creepy critters.   In other words, I’m not leaving the light on for them.  No bats allowed at my house.

*I  must add here that if not for the suggestion by one of our doctors that day, the unthinkable might have happened.  Shortly after finding the bat, we had an appointment at the dermatologist’s office.  Joseph was going on about how it was so cool that he’d found this bat.  The doctor was the one who suggested we send the bat off for testing.  Had we not had that appointment that day, who knows what would have happened?  Joseph possibly got bitten, as he had said the animal “scratched” him.  He was young enough that discerning what really happened was difficult.  The doctor could very well have saved his life that day!

Penn State Student Outrage

GRRRRRR.  This just pisses me off.  Bunch of losers.  Scumbags.

Ok, now that I’ve gotten the bad mouthing out of my system, let’s talk good sense.

The horrific story that emerged out of Penn State this week is now paired with a lesser, though certainly outrageous, story:  Groups of students gathering on the Penn State campus and at the home of Joe Paterno, pledging their support for him and their anger over his termination.  I just pulled up a http://www.cnn.com/ (you can still see the photo if you click here) story that features a photo of four young students with disgruntled, defiant faces, sitting next to a bronze statue of Paterno with his hand in the air gesturing that the school is “Number 1.”  Seriously?  Someone will be tearing that statue down soon, I thought, as an image of Iraqi citizens pulling down the statue of Saddam Hussein flashed into my head.  But the dismantling of an icon isn’t starting with these boys.  As I look at their faces, it’s obvious to me just how wrong they are.  After all, a grand jury has already revealed the reality that Paterno and an assistant were aware what was going on, and basically ignored it–for nearly a decade.  It’s incomprehensible to me that these students could be in support of this man, whose lack of moral courage in this case clearly trumps any accolades and accomplishments he may have earned as a coach at this university.  The oblivious ignorance of these students is tragic.  What’s wrong with people?

As I look at this one picture of four college boys, it occurrs to me that they are the age many of Sandusky’s victims would be now.  The boys in this photo are enrolled in what was, until this scandal emerged, a prestigious university.  They likely come from stable, loving homes.   In contrast, imagine how the lives of those victims turned out to be.  Imagine a life of shame, pain, perhaps poverty, depression, and only God knows what else.  What a gross injustice, a slap in the face to common decency, for these spoiled brats to sit there in support of man who is, as far as I’m concerned, a pedophile by proxy.

Google Trash

 Ever wonder if we are really tuned in to what’s happening in the world?  Does your average person know, for example, what’s going on with the economy, government, world politics?  What about issues or problems going on in their communities or schools?  Information that could help them fight a disease or live healthier lives?  Talk show hosts like Jay Leno sometimes like to have fun with this sort of thing, going down the street, for example, asking people some question about a current event or policy—something ridiculously obvious—having a good laugh over how uninformed your average Joe actually is.  But, after a friend of mine suggested I start studying Google Trends to get ideas for writing topics, I am starting to wonder if this lack of awareness, itself, is a trend.

 Google Trends is a site that compiles data about what people are searching on the web any particular day.  It is searchable, and can be narrowed to any specific date of your choosing.  I browsed through about 25% of the month of September, finding that most of the keyword searches for all dates fell into one of two categories:  Sports or Entertainment.  I can turn on Fox News any hour of the day and the commentators will be going on about the failures and follies of government, the economy, and the Middle East.  Time and time again, commentators spiel about what Americans want or don’t want out of their government.  If Americans are so concerned about what’s going on in our country, why are they spending so much time looking up nonsense on the Internet?  Why, for example, was “Andy Whitfield” the number one searched keyword on September 11, 2011?  Andy Whitfield was a Welsh actor that died on September 11.  He wasn’t even American.

Either few people are in tune, or they are tuning in somewhere else.

Just for fun, let’s check out the date September 15, 2011 on Google Trends*.

Number one on the list?  Michaele Salahi, one-half of the pair who crashed the White House dinner in 2009.  Apparently, she had an affair with the guitarist from the band Journey, and that was riveting news.  Why are we wasting time writing and reading about some idiot who is basically famous for being a forty-something juvenile delinquent?

Number two on the list:  America’s Got Talent.  Well, yes, it does and I love the show as much as the next person, but…Really?

Really? 

Do these topics deserve the apparently meaningless notoriety of being the top two most-searched terms on September 15, 2011?

Do you think your average American knows this?  On September 15, 2011, President Obama awarded the Medal of Honor to Kentucky-born Marine Dakota Meyer.  Meyer is credited with saving 36 lives in Afghanistan on September 8, 2009.  He’s the first living Marine to receive the honor since 1973.  Yep, you guessed it.  None of the following terms made the Google list that day:  Dakota Meyer, Medal of Honor, Marines.  But “apple juice” did.

Google Trends, it seems, says more about our guilty pleasures, fears, and voyeurism than it does our sense of cultural solidarity or identity.  Call it Google Trash.  It’s shameful that we didn’t take time to know more about Dakota Meyer.  I guess the good guys really do finish last.

 

*I should point out that while Google Trends does compile information across various regions and countries, this particular piece is based on Google Trends Hot Searches, which is limited only to search terms within the U.S., on a particular day.

Distraction

Last weekend, our town held the annual “Take A Stand” rally, which uses lemonade stands to raise awareness about child abuse.  One of them caught my eye, as it displayed what appeared to be two adult-size skeletons on either side.  It was a bold statement:  Death is the most tragic result of abuse.  But for me, the intent of the skeleton display missed the mark.  Was it really a message about child abuse, or was it also a message—fueled by Casey Anthony’s recent acquittal and public outcry over the verdict—that suggested she belongs on death row, not walking out of the Orange County jail?  What appeared to be merely a strong statement was nearly as outrageous as the media circus that had surrounded the Anthony case from the beginning.  Such antics do little to serve truth or justice, but, rather, simply distract us from real issues and problems that deserve our serious consideration.

Admittedly, I was a little intrigued by the Anthony saga.  Like many Americans, I got sucked into the story. After the trial and acquittal, I gave in to curiosity and clicked on aFox News link to watch the footage of Anthony’s release from jail.  As she stalked stony-faced, cameras flashing, trailing an atypical entourage of lawyers and police officers, the only thing missing from the scene was a pair of sunglasses.  The Anthony case has been repeatedly compared to the OJ Simpson trial that became a national sensation in 1995, all the way up to the footage of an SUV carrying Anthony down a Florida freeway, following her release.  But this one has a twist.  OJ was famous before his infamous trial.  Casey Anthony, a woman completely unknown three years ago, has become a celebrity through all this—the kind throngs of people love to hate—starring in a reality show that has gripped the nation and the world.

Beyond the most obviously disturbing element of this case—the death of a little girl—what’s ultimately unsettling is the role that public opinion, driven by the media, has played.  The overwhelming sentiment is that Anthony is guilty, despite having been fully examined, analyzed, and judged by our judicial system.  These people who stand outside the jail, shouting condemnations are responding to a case to which they have no personal connection.  Are they simply caught up in the drama, upset it didn’t end the way they’d hoped?  Or is it something more?  Are they arrogant enough to believe they know something the rest of the people in that courtroom didn’t?  But then I remember.  Casey Anthony was guilty” from day one, from the very first day this story hit the media.  Of course people are going to be upset.  If a killer walks free, it’s a great injustice, a tragedy in itself.

My point is this:  This case has been nothing but a big distraction from beginning to end, and I for one am baffled as to why it has gotten so much
attention.  When Bill O’Reilly actually made a comment about Anthony being “a good looking woman,” suggesting that this factor had relevance to the attention the case had garnered, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.  Is that what we’ve come to?  Really??!  REALLY? I know there are agencies and organizations that hand out awards to media outlets for outstanding journalism and the like, but please, if there is one that gives out Media Pinhead Trophies, can we just nominate Bill for that one, based on this one asinine statement?

Distraction.

Every day, children go missing, are abused or the victims of unimaginable crimes.  Most sources cite the number of children who go missing every year at around 800,000.  John Walsh, the host of America’s Most Wanted, is quoted as saying that number is closer to 1.5 million, with about 50,000 of those that go completely unsolved.  (http://www.operationawareness.com/about_5.html)

It’s mind-boggling and disheartening to think how much time and energy was devoted to the exploitation of this one case, when those resources, applied in the right ways and in the most needed places, could have helped find or save the life of another endangered or missing child. Educating and training kids to recognize and avoid a dangerous situation would be a good place to start—and these simple tools, incredibly, are not even discussed or taught in our public schools.

One could argue, I suppose, that the media attention to this case has raised a bit of awareness about child abuse and child endangerment. But this awareness has been fueled by anger and emotion, which isn’t positive, nor helpful, in most cases.  Unfortunately in this one, anger and emotion have created a media and a public that tries, convicts, and exploits.  A story surfaced, just today, that a church in Ohio actually conducted a service that included a mock Casey Anthony trial, which ended, ironically enough, with a hung jury.

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/18/casey-anthony-mock-retrial_n_901463.html)

Distraction:  I believe it is nothing more than a failure to acknowledge God’s sovereignty.

God, and only God, has the final say on all matters, including what ultimately happens to Casey Anthony.  Though we must have legal precedent and procedures in a civilized society, we ultimately have no right to say what she does or doesn’t deserve.  The twelve people who sat on that jury found her not guilty in the eyes of the law, not in the eyes of public opinion.  Yes, it’s possible they made a mistake, but creating a spectacle, protesting, and issuing death threats to the woman are not going to change the outcome—this is not a reality show; it’s simply Reality.  Distraction, as much as we may enjoy it, impedes God’s work from being put into action where it’s truly needed.  God help Casey Anthony, and God help us all.

Where Were You?

Today marks the 25th anniversary of the Challenger disaster.  Many of us remember exactly where we were, of course, as it is one of those impactful moments that one never forgets.  I was a junior in high school when it happened, and I was sitting in French class.  I can’t remember that teacher’s name, but her face is forever burned in my memory because of how it looked that day, pale and sallow as she stood at the front of the room and explained what had happened.  Honestly, I can’t remember if we were already watching the launch at the time, or if she turned it on afterwards so we could see the footage, but as we watched, I remember being very confused.  The impact of it did not come until later, as the footage and discussion of it circulated on the news and amongst everyone for days after that.  Remembering that event immediately makes me think of 9/11.  The day Elvis died.  Princess Diana’s tragic end.  I know exactly where I was those times.  But there are plenty of other events in my lifetime–arguably just as notable, equally as tragic–that I have little memory of.  Where was I when John Lennon was assassinated?  During the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan?  When the Berlin Wall fell?  When the World Trade Center was bombed the first time?  Oklahoma City bombing?  Columbine?  Why are some events catalogued so specifically in my personal history and yet others are not?

The media has a lot to do with why we remember events, of course.  The more media coverage, the higher likelihood we will see it, repeatedly, and remember it.  But why the specific moments?   

Perhaps our memory of events such as assassinations are detailed because they involve just one person–one important person.  It makes sense that our consciousness would save those because there’s less for it to keep track of.  The singularity of the event is key.  But what about events that involve several people?  The first WTC bombing for example.  I remember virtually nothing about it.  But I remember that I was sitting on a plaid couch in my pajamas, in my living room in Rolla, MO, just getting ready to get in the shower, when the Twin Towers fell on September 11, 2001.  Is there a tipping point with regard to the numbers?  Does the sheer number of people killed that day drive its impact, make it more personal?   Or does our brain go back to the singularity and seize on say, one specific image–such as an explosion?

Al sorts of variables come into play, of course–the environment we are in, whether or not a teacher or someone else is reinforcing the memory, how much we engage with the media, and what elements of our own personal history get stirred when a tragic event happens.  But are our memories of specific events so closely tied to who we are that the memory is manifested as where we are?  Does it matter much, cognitively speaking, if the person impacted is a head of state or a close family member, for example?  Does our consciousness distinguish events based on internal, or external, criteria? 

I remember where I was then my grandmother passed away.  I was sitting at a desk at work eating my lunch when the phone rang.  It was my aunt calling to tell me.  After I got off the phone, I stood up, walked around for a few confused minutes, then returned to the class where I was substituting.  The hallway became sort of surreal, people passing me in a haze.  I remember thinking, “My grandma just died.”  And I wanted to tell someone, but there was no one to tell.  It was a rather small event in the grand scheme of things, but to me, in that instant, it was as impactful as a bomb, a pulled trigger, something gone terribly, catastrophically wrong.  For me, it was a moment sadly, and so vividly, to remember.

 

Birds Of A Feather

The Internet has been abuzz lately with reports of birds falling out of the sky and waterways filling up with dead fish.  Just google the words “bird deaths” and you will get everything from official news reports to chat rooms prattling on about conspiracy theories and apocalypse and humanity’s contribution to global climate change.  In Louisiana, 500 birds found.  In Kentucky, only a handful by comparison.  Now, there are similar reports in Maryland, Sweden and Brazil.  Chatter around the media has become as loud and overwhelming as a flock itself—and it’s getting bigger every day. 

Admittedly, when news of the nearly 5,000 birds found dead in Arkansas surfaced, I was intrigued enough to follow the story, and to take note of others that followed.  I found myself saying things like, “Maybe it’s the end of the world” and “What’s going on?”  But common sense tells me there is both less—and more—to this string of oddities. 

First of all, it all started, conveniently, just before midnight, on New Year’s Eve, at a time when people are naturally more susceptible to the impending uncertainty that surrounds the coming of a new year.  We get anxious when change is approaching.  A flock of dead birds on New Year’s Eve is fodder for this collective anxiety.  Imagine if this story had surfaced on the crux of the millennium.  Back then, Y2K was going to render our precious technology defunct, derail our computer systems, and throw us into an archaic tailspin.  Reports of dying animals would have sent most of us into a fetal position on the floor of our closet. 

 Secondly, I believe our country has grown increasingly paranoid over the last ten years, and paranoia is the media’s best friend.  A slow news day is particularly fertile ground for stirring up fear and trepidation.  Not only does the media exploit anxiety, but we eat it up.  Remember the  duct tape frenzy?  Retailers even got in on that one.  Face it, the media is quick to jump on our nerves and feed us just what we don’t need to hear—or, feed us what will serve the particular fear or even political squabble of the day.  The Arkansas bird story might not have made national news, say, five years ago, when we were under a Republican administration.

 The fact is, mass animal deaths are, according to experts, not that unusual.  In fact, if you go to the USGS (United States Geological Survey), you will find detailed reports on all sorts of weather, environmental and wildlife events.  In the following link, you will find quarterly reports specific to wildlife deaths. 

http://www.nwhc.usgs.gov/publications/quarterly_reports/index.jsp

What you will find is that millions of animals have been found dead—in groups numbering from a handful to hundreds of thousands—since 1995.  The causes range anywhere from gunshot to weather to starvation and diseases such as botulism, avian cholera and fungal infections.  For example, 10,000 birds were found dead in CA in 1995, reportedly due to botulism.  Nearly 30,000 birds of various kinds were found dead across the country in the third quarter of 2009.  And I’d venture to bet that few of you know about a million frogs dying off in 2009.  The cause?  Fungus.  Only a handful of these cases are unsolved.  For example, about 20,000 birds were found dead in Mexico in 1995, due to unknown causes.

The media is ruffling our feathers, and some of us are joining the flock.  Mass animal deaths are troubling, and they can be alarming, sometimes, depending on the circumstances.  As a nature lover and a supporter of conservation, I am saddened by these reports.  But, at the end of the day, most of these deaths can be attributed to natural causes.  The majority of them are the result of disease, not God’s wrath upon the earth, or man’s destruction of the earth.  What we are witnessing is the reality of the planet we share with the animals we love.

-Melissa Dereberry

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers